David Thompson on The Vestergaard Odyssey.
David T on McCarthyism.
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
That whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of those ends,
it is the right of the People to alter or abolish it and to institute new Government.
You might also like (or dislike)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(744)
-
▼
December
(45)
- Religion and reason
- Merry Christmas
- Jewish conspiracy update
- Fans as slaves
- Coffee as fuel
- Quote
- Just one problem
- Lucky dogs
- Break it to her gently
- Epidemic hysteria
- The school of the future
- Spiritual capital
- Almost
- The Telegraph
- The greatest living Irishman
- Poultry and primitive accumulation
- Libel costs
- Refrigeration denial
- Libel tourism
- Tales from the Unix mailing lists
- Dog lullabies and horse prosthetics
- Five hundred years in 300 words
- Do not click this link
- Davids
- Tin foil
- Unintended consequences
- Cargo cult economics
- Ritual slaughter
- Occupying the same space
- Maths
- Death penalty and utilitarianism
- Matching the crime
- Kicking the dog
- The poisoned well
- Debate continues
- War
- Quality of life
- Intellectual monoculture
- Things we should blame America for, part 23456
- Predictable, I know
- The first draft of history
- Headline of the day
- Effect and cause
- Analysis of the Mumbai massacre
- How?
-
▼
December
(45)
ShareThis
See Also
Blogroll
1 comment:
McCarthy was a disgusting, drunken bully who invented fake "evidence" to support his case. But the conspicuous feature of McCarthyism was that, in broad terms, he was right; that is, he was right that the Roosevelt administration was heavily penetrated by Soviet agents. I suggest we ought to preserve the noun Mccarthyism for the arguments of reckless sonofabitches who, despite absent or faked evidence, happen to be right. The first time I came across a case of scientific McCarthyism, a crook had published a paper with an honest (or middling honest) man, who had finally realised that there were "data" in the paper that had been invented but said of his crooked co-author that "his intuition was so good that the faked data were probably pretty near the truth". There are, or were, people who reckon that Millikan's celebrated oil-drop data were, in my sense, McCarthyite. Hey ho.
Post a Comment