This is, of course, the most interesting class of things.
I'm reading Power and Plenty at the moment. I generally think protectionism is a bad thing. But on p.347 it is argued that Britain's rise to wealth during the Industrial Revolution owed something to protectionism: that the imports of raw materials were allowed freely but those of manufactured goods restricted, which boosted the nascent manufacturing sector. That does, in fact, seem logical - though of course a cost would have been borne by consumers who would have been forced to pay artificially higher prices for manufactured goods. However, so great a benefit as a successful Industrial Revolution, one that enriched everyone, is a powerful counterweight to this disadvantage.
That does, of course, rely on the assumption that these restrictions on imports had a significant effect on the course of the Industrial Revolution, and that isn't quantified in the book.
Friday, January 16, 2009
Things that challenge things I believe
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
So the whole argument rests on an untested assumption. Great.
I would suggest you read Henry Carey's 'the harmony of interests', which you can find on Google books. It may interest you - or indeed challenge your views!
Post a Comment