tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post6677164546735309668..comments2023-08-20T11:07:28.396+01:00Comments on Freeborn John: The BBC and Climate ChangePeter Risdonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17792275403997179926noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-38730188500761896602008-04-10T20:02:00.000+01:002008-04-10T20:02:00.000+01:00I should have said that, to be fair to Richard, he...I should have said that, to be fair to Richard, he did reply promptly to my email, and pointed me in the direction of this:<BR/>http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/11/climate_sceptics.html<BR/>Excerpt: "Given the weight of opinion building up around the IPCC it makes sense for us to focus our coverage on the consensus that climate change is happening, is serious, but is manageable if tackled urgently. <BR/><BR/>We do not need consistently to ‘balance’ the reports of the IPCC."thruppennybithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15318468521445204029noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-47107325777311181272008-04-10T19:54:00.000+01:002008-04-10T19:54:00.000+01:00I think Messrs Harabin and Black have given up all...I think Messrs Harabin and Black have given up all pretence of balance. I wrote to Richard Black last month when he reported on the climate change declarations of American Southern Baptists (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7287484.stm)<BR/>This was a week after the New York Climate Change Conference and the Manhattan Declaration, which the two "reporters" have completely ignored. The BBC is quite happy proselytising for the Church of Global Warming (Souther Baptist Branch) whilst ignoring the reasoned arguments of respected scientists plus the President of an EU Statethruppennybithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15318468521445204029noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-58110082656902975742008-04-09T15:44:00.000+01:002008-04-09T15:44:00.000+01:00Hi Peter,The paragraph directly above your screens...Hi Peter,<BR/><BR/>The paragraph directly above your screenshot reads:<BR/><BR/>The date and time shown at the top of the modified, updated article is JULY 3rd, 13:04 GMT. The following screen shot was taken today, April 9th at 12:30pm BST:<BR/><BR/>Shouldn't that July be April?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-45252219781159871972008-04-09T14:52:00.000+01:002008-04-09T14:52:00.000+01:00Yes... the Harrabin change was just a minor revisi...Yes... the Harrabin change was just a minor revision... no need for a time-stamp change....<BR/><BR/>Zero credibility BBC.... <BR/><BR/>Harrabin must go!!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com