tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post3794078709207363441..comments2023-08-20T11:07:28.396+01:00Comments on Freeborn John: Global warming debatesPeter Risdonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17792275403997179926noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-51561151165040712542010-02-15T06:20:54.036+00:002010-02-15T06:20:54.036+00:00I love the way he waves his book around.
Not.
Mo...I love the way he waves his book around.<br /><br />Not.<br /><br />MonBiot has wobbled on his belief after climategate, surely Plimer could have thrown the CRU behaviour in his face, got it across to the viewers?Clunking Fisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18020166717482531977noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-7890848000861682812010-02-12T16:01:24.607+00:002010-02-12T16:01:24.607+00:00Just so, DM. It's also trivially simple to sho...Just so, DM. It's also trivially simple to show how the past decade could be the warmest on record and also showing a cooling trend. The point is, Plimer evades these questions.Peter Risdonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17792275403997179926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-48203561866254223112010-02-12T15:57:16.701+00:002010-02-12T15:57:16.701+00:00I'm baffled. If it's the first question t...I'm baffled. If it's the first question that you're referring to (I watched no further), it's accepted by all sides, I believe, that the reported "Global Mean Temperature" peaked in 1998. Hell, Trenberth (sp?) was banging on about how embarrassing it was for his side in the leaked CRU e-mails.<br /><br />Of course, it's not widely agreed what merit the "reported Global Mean Temperature" has: the doctoring of the "observations" used in its computation seems to be often loony and, perhaps, fraudulent. Perhaps time will tell.deariemenoreply@blogger.com