tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post7813595197822470770..comments2023-08-20T11:07:28.396+01:00Comments on Freeborn John: Sex crimesPeter Risdonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17792275403997179926noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-36335759886548522392009-03-23T01:49:00.000+00:002009-03-23T01:49:00.000+00:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-1923571993899728492009-03-17T20:49:00.000+00:002009-03-17T20:49:00.000+00:00you have acknowledged you are working on anecdotes...you have acknowledged you are working on anecdotes, but even so...<BR/>two of the women you have lived with (out of how many ?) have been stranger-raped, with one having been victim of a gang-rape. Gang- or stranger-rapes normally being the sort of thing that involve ambulances, police, etc.<BR/><BR/>So how do you know that you are making a decision based on good facts ? Because you believe them ?<BR/><BR/>http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article710504.ece<BR/><BR/>http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2008/03/woman-29-fined-over-fake-rape.html<BR/><BR/>http://www.chesterstandard.co.uk/chesternews/Chester-woman-jailed-for-fake.3899598.jp<BR/><BR/>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/3812209.stm<BR/><BR/>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2988208.stm<BR/><BR/>this is, as you suggest, a serious issue, and it deserves serious analysis. The "one-in-four" rape statistics just don't cut it.<BR/><BR/>perAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-28098937980554972562009-03-14T03:08:00.000+00:002009-03-14T03:08:00.000+00:00Boys get raped in numbers nearly equalling girls, ...Boys get raped in numbers nearly equalling girls, most pedophiles don't make great difference between the sexes for children. They like babies, period. The assaults on boys don't get reported or prosecuted in the same numbers as girls because of social bias in reporting and judicial prosecution. <BR/><BR/>Anyone working sex cases will tell you there are three common sexual preferences; straight, gay, and children. Some people prefer our children, as disgusting as that is, and we can't assume these pederasts prefer girls - they don't, the bastards will abuse anything young and hairless.<BR/><BR/>I ran through the judicial/social system when my boy got raped and received an education I never wanted on the perversion of men and the unjust nature of laws protecting boy children from predators.<BR/><BR/>Rape isn't an arena for who deserves more victim status than another. Women, men or children - no matter. It's a foul and evil act that should be fought and punished from every corner of decent society.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-6479490122615582462009-03-11T20:31:00.000+00:002009-03-11T20:31:00.000+00:00Of course there are exceptions. Men raping men, bo...Of course there are exceptions. Men raping men, boys etc. Or women assaulting children. Which falls more into the paedo corner and it's rather gross complexities and our rightful modern concern with it. <BR/><BR/>But it does remain women who are most at risk and above all are taught to protect themselves, consider their surroundings and their behaviour and the whole issue uniquely. Not men. Noone would argue with that.<BR/><BR/>I do wonder how men feel about that education women get out of course and so why Will Selfs piece should be so uniquely strange or challenging. <BR/><BR/>100 years ago it would have been the complete opposite women were taught and so Self's piece would have been ridiculous. I often wonder why in gaining a certain level of freedom we now have to fear you, or particular regular social circumstances, just to stay safe. Isn't that all worse than what Self is saying? <BR/><BR/>To be honest, I see his piece as rather reassuring.<BR/><BR/>It's a rather direct piece as a good start to addressing that issue and asking you guys to consider the issue yourselves on an intellectual level. Such general considerations ARE rare, even if your own opinion is very noble. And his piece is certainly no less demonstrable of intellectual integrity than men who, per the links below, couldn't care less about rape. <BR/><BR/>If only I/we didn't have to.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12471112.post-62508862466692565682009-03-10T05:27:00.000+00:002009-03-10T05:27:00.000+00:00"There's some justice in this, based on physical s...<I>"There's some justice in this, based on physical strength."</I><BR/><BR/>I'm afraid this I <I>don't</I> agree with. <BR/><BR/>Physical strength and the potential to use it should be totally immaterial in unwarranted sexual contact. It's just as wrong if a woman does it - no excuses!JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.com